Canon’s PIXMA Pro9500; How Does Canon’s New Consumer Pigment Ink Photo Printer Perform? Page 2
|
On a positive note, the PIXMA Pro9500 includes a very easy and reliable manual front-load feed for heavy art papers. The printer is also quieter than most of the many other brands and models I have used. And its self-checking and cleaning seems to assure consistently high-quality prints, with an amusing routine that moves the print head in quick, short strokes that rocks the printer. This apparently strange behavior has the purpose of agitating the ink cartridge contents so the ink does not settle, eliminating any variation in print intensity over time. And, after making a fairly large stack of prints that would usually have made me expect the need to replace several of the ink cartridges, all were half or slightly more full, with the exception of the gray. I assumed the gray was low because I did make a fairly large number of black and white test prints.
|
Evaluation And Recommendation
Of course it would have been tempting to compare the print results from the
Canon imagePROGRAF iPF5000 with those of the PIXMA Pro9500, but I could only
do that to a very limited extent as I only printed on both printers with two
papers, the Hahnemühle Pearl and PremierArt Watercolor. But these two papers
did show a slight difference, though I could not say one is really better than
the other. The differences are so subtle I am hard-pressed to find a way to
describe it. I can say that the luster-surfaced Hahnemühle Pearl seems
to be favored by the PIXMA Pro9500 in one dimension, which is otherwise the
paper's greatest weakness. There is less surface shine differential in
areas printed and unprinted on the paper's surface, making the PIXMA Pro9500
stand out as the best printer to use with this new kind of luster-surfaced,
fiber-based paper. This was also born out in the prints made on Canon's
Photo Paper Plus, their recommended RC semigloss paper for the Pro9500. It also
showed a greater consistency in the surface shine. And I personally and particularly
favor the PIXMA Pro9500's gray scale printing option, being very simple
and easy to use. It yielded consistent, neutral grays.
In the past, photo inkjet printers employed the traditional ink color palette
of cyan, magenta, yellow, and black, and then added light cyan and magenta to
the mix to reproduce the full range of colors in a photographic image. But making
color inks that are entirely pure and free of other color contaminants has never
been fully possible, so all the intermediate colors had to be reproduced by
mixing just three ink colors. Some subjects suffered, and the diversity of green
foliage colors, peachy complexion tones, and sky blue seldom looked as real
as many of us hoped for.
|
So, my selection of test print subjects included some hard to replicate colors.
In response to this challenge the Canon PIXMA Pro9500 did particularly well
for a pigment ink printer that also produced very good density maximum blacks
and rich color saturation. I sincerely believe this is in part due to Canon's
ink color palette and color printing strategy, including two primary colors,
red and green, as well as a neutral gray ink, which reduces the amount of ink
mixing needed to reproduce intermediate colors that look natural.
With just about the highest street price for a 13" pigment ink photo inkjet
ranging from $759-$974, the Canon PIXMA Pro9500 should be worth the cost, particularly
if the low ink usage rate I experienced holds true for other users. Although
I did not have the printer that long, the automatic self-diagnosing and maintenance
regimen of the Pro9500 performs nearly as well as with Canon's wide-format
printers, like the iPF5000 I've been using. That means photographers can
expect very reliable and consistent print results. So although it's no
bargain, I think the Canon PIXMA Pro9500 is a good value indeed.
|
For more information, contact Canon U.S.A., Inc., One Canon Plaza, Lake Success, NY 11042; (800) 652-2666, (516) 328-5000; www.canonusa.com.
- Log in or register to post comments