ND's and Polarizers are a necessity in my opinion. it is still better to get that perfect shot in camera, not in photoshop.
Please briefly comment on your experience with polarizer and ND filters for your DSLR photography.
- Log in or register to post comments
I always use grad ND filters for sunrise & sunset. The greatest software in the world cannot bring back burned out hightlights. Neither can it reduce the glare that a polarizer can when shooting refective surfaces. I also use solid ND's for shooting waterfalls.
My lenses are almost always covered with a polarizing filter (unless there is an extremely low light situation). I also carry around several graduated ND filters in my vest pocket for those times when the contrast range of a scene is so great that the camera's histogram spans the entire range from whites to blacks.
I use ND and polarizer filters from time to time for effects I know of no software for. For instance, removing glare and capturing details beneath the surface of water or emphasizing the flow of a waterfall in brighter than ideal light.
You can't "imitate" the effect of a polarizer, and if you want a long exposure to, say, blur moving water, you may need an ND filter to avoid overexposure. It would be nice if DSLRs had really low ISOs available - like 5 or 10 or even 1, but I doubt this is compatible with how the sensors actually work.
I mostly use a circular Polarizer. I shoot a lot of desert shots and nothing pops that winter blue sky like a good polarizer. The only time I don't use an ND outdoors very much as my camera has a pretty low ISO for the bottom. But I do use an ND in the studio, in fact sometimes even a CP to reduce specular highlights and reflective distractions on glossy surfaces.