Photo How To

The megapixel race shows no signs of abating as camera manufacturers continue to promote the benefits of high-res cameras while ignoring some of the disadvantages. The result is that many shooters are think about investing in a new and expensive high-resolution monster.

We suggest that before making the leap you carefully evaluate the difference between what you want and what you need. This thoughtful discussion from pro Ejaz Khan is intended to help you make an informed purchasing decision, and there's a lot more to consider beyond cost.

Khan begins the discussion with a couple pertanent questions: "Do you think high-megapixel cameras make your photography prints better? How many megapixels do you really need?" An honest answer depends upon a variety of factors including the type of images you make and the manner in which you share them.

Khan explores the topic in terms of making large prints, and you'll be amazed to learn what camera he used to output some really nice huge prints. He puts it like this: "You'll discover how much resolution you actually need to create stunning high-quality prints—even at sizes like 4x6 ft.

Khan discusses the key concept of viewing distance and explains when and why printing at 300 dpi isn't always a necessity. And then there's the issue of requirements for posting photos on social media sites and other platforms in which images are viewed on a computer screen.

Another key fact is that "modern upscaling software can make a massive difference regardless of the camera you use." Khan shares real-world examples of images that have been upscaled and cropped—and then printed to perfection.

The bottom line is that after watching Khan debunk what he calls the "megapixel myth" you may be tempted to put your money where "it matters most," namely into better lenses. You'll find other interesting and controversial videos on Khan's popular YouTube channel.

Be sure not to miss the tutorial we posted recently from another accomplished pro who reveals "the one concept that 99% of photographers get wrong." Then he demonstrates several foolproof methods for solving the problem.