Site Links
|
 |
 |
 |
The Whitewater Experience Wedding And Portrait Class For All Seasons
By Monte Zucker April, 2001
| |
|
1
Photos © 1999, Monte Zucker, All Rights Reserved
|
|
Fall came late last year
to Wisconsin. Either that, or my annual Whitewater class was earlier
than it has ever been. Usually, we have autumn color. This time we had
sunshine, rain, and a lot of fun (nothing new!). Through it all we learned
to photograph in the studio, by window light, outdoors in sunlight and
shade, and more.
It seemed as if many photographers
had been taught to stay out of the sunshine, photographing only in shaded
areas. I wondered why. Most of the people with whom I have come in contact
with just love the sunshine. They’re disappointed when the sun doesn’t
shine, or when they don’t have the opportunity to play in the sun. Why
wouldn’t they enjoy having their portraits made in a sunny location?
So, of course we began the
Whitewater Experience this year by going out into the direct sunshine
with this group of five sisters and brothers. Where did we pose them?
Of course, right in the middle of Michele Gauger’s back yard. Well,
"back yard" is putting it mildly. She has her home studio situated on
quite a few acres of a peninsula between two parts of Whitewater Lake.
Not a bad location for a class, huh?
|
|
Selecting Outdoor Backgrounds
The selection of the background was one of the main things that I was
teaching the class. I looked for a spot that had a lot of depth behind
where I would put the subjects. I wanted it to be fairly well lit with
sunshine behind them, so that when I added flash to the picture the background
area would not go black. My choice also was determined by finding a spot
where there would not be a lot of contrasting areas between the green
trees and sky. Essentially, what I wanted was a spot where the green foliage
came all the way down to the grass with no tree trunks with sky between
them.
There it was. Right in front
of our eyes.
As usual, I began the posing
with a fun grouping: a way to get all the kids to relax and see that this
was going to be a casual, enjoyable experience. I began with laying the
oldest brother on the ground, resting his head on his left hand and tucking
his right hand under him. I positioned him so that the sunshine would
come from behind him and slightly to the side. The backlighting would
be a great separation of the people from the background, adding to the
depth of the picture. The sun was almost straight up, so there was a risk
of sunshine dabbling onto their faces, but I wasn’t too worried about
that. It would look natural (Photo 1).
|
|
Then, I just piled everyone
on top of each other, the youngest on top. I didn’t really go into a lot
of posing. I just told them to get their heads touching the one below
them and to wrap their arms around each other. That would prevent a lot
of arms sticking out all over the place. I selected a 150mm lens for my
Hasselblad so that I could contain the background to just the narrow view
behind them--essentially cutting out any chance of distracting areas of
sky coming into view. A simple green background was all that I wanted.
I exposed to get good color
in bright sunshine using Kodak Portra 160 film, 1/125 at f/16. Their faces
were in almost total shade. There was really nothing bright around them
to reflect the light back into their faces. A reflector would have been
too bright and cause them to squint. So, what I did was to use my Quantum
Radio Slave unit to fire my Quantum flash at full power. I positioned
my light to my right, because all the faces were pointed in that direction.
The flash was set at full power and was about 10’ from them. The sunshine
was so bright, I knew that the flash could in no way overpower the natural
sunlight. No measurements. Just point and shoot.
A Polaroid test print not only
proved me to be right on the exposure, but it also gave the kids something
to enjoy and gain their confidence. Heck, they were having so much fun,
at that point they would have done anything I asked.
|
|
By adding the flash to the
ambient light I was able to tone down the background slightly, so that
you wouldn’t notice all the plants growing up onto their stakes in the
background. The background went subdued, but retained its detail--exactly
what I was looking to do.
The next grouping I did with
them began with seating the three younger children on the ground and adding
the two older ones behind and between them. I wasn’t happy with that composition,
because I felt that the two larger bodies seemed to dominate the picture
too much. Instead of taking the picture and going on, I scrubbed the composition
and began with the older sister seated as the anchor in the center of
the group.
Then, I added the two younger
sisters--one on each side (Photo 2). I had them slip out away from the
older girl and lean over to her. That lowered their heads nicely and gave
me a way to connect the three of them together, the way I like to do in
all of my family groups. I asked the younger of the two brothers to kneel
down beside his sister and to rest his chin on her shoulder. That left
the opening for the older brother to kneel down on the other side of his
sister and complete the grouping. The same strong flash came in from camera-right
to open up their faces and subdue the background.
|
|
I then asked the class to find
another background for me. I had already selected the next spot, but I
wanted to give them the opportunity to think for themselves. No one picked
the "nothing" background that I selected here.
It was a natural (Photo 3).
Lots of depth. Sunlight backlighting the various layers of green. A little
bit of the back lake showing, and a fairly nice line between the trees
and the sky.
Group of five? Three in front,
two in the back. As simple as that! Legs apart, straight into the camera.
I had done it successfully before. I knew that it would work again. Not
a lot of posing. One demonstration of how I wanted them all to stand and
it was finished! One flash opening up the deep shadows on their faces
and we were done!
And So Began BPPI!
Then, I asked again for everyone to find the next location. I knew that
I would absolutely floor everyone when I suggested opening the barn doors.
Yep, that’s where we went, into the barn with the chickens, hens,
geese, horses, cats, and whatever else there might have been scurrying
around. You know, I already have members in my organization, GPPI and
CPPI (Garage Professional Photographers International and Carport Professional
Photographers International, for those who can’t afford a garage).
Well, that day I instituted the new BPPI (Barn Professional Photographers
International). It was a huge success.
|
|
We went inside and set up my
painted background (I could have used the natural background inside, but
Gauger thought that it was too messy). Anyhow, the light was coming in
from our right side. All I had to do was to split light the faces of the
older sister and brother, who I sat on posing stools about 6-10’ from
the entrance way.
Then, I put my Westcott Monte
Illuminator/silver reflector camera right to pick up the daylight and
to wrap it around onto the shadowed side of their faces (Photo 4).
The reflector had to be turned
mostly toward the outside of the barn door opening so that it would pick
up the daylight outside. Then, the daylight simply bounced off of the
reflector onto the right side of their faces. The photographers in the
class couldn’t get over it. They had always thought that the reflector
went on the shadowed side. I explained to them that in that position it
would bring in light from the opposite direction. I wanted the light to
appear very natural, all coming in from the same side. They agreed that
it looked great.
|
|
High Key Portraits Outdoors?
Then I really floored everyone by bringing the same two kids just outside
the barn doors and brought the whole class inside the barn. About 6’ from
the entrance to the barn I had two people hold up my Westcott translucent
4x6’ panel for a background. The group couldn’t believe how simple it
was to create the high key background in the middle of "nowhere."
I turned their bodies at a
45° angle to the camera to support their profiles. I connected the two
together by having the brother put his right arm around his sister, and
then brought up his left hand to bring them together still more. The lighting
on both of their profiles was coming straight through the translucent
background. The hairlight was from the light coming over the top of the
Westcott panel. The fill light was partially from the light that was coming
around both sides of the panel, but I added my silver reflector inside
to help open up the shadowed side of their faces. The reflector was low
and pointed up toward the sky so that it would pick up the light from
above (Photo 5).
The picture would have been
more effective had they been wearing white shirts, but the point was shown
that it’s easy to create high key pictures with daylight.
|
|
Studio Simplicity
Most photographers think early in their career that it’s much easier to
take pictures outdoors than in a studio. That’s because they’re not familiar
with studio lighting. They think that outdoors you can get by with just
about any lighting, but indoors is very complicated. Actually, it’s exactly
the other way around. Indoors you have complete control of the light.
You can count on it being the same every time. Outdoors, however, you
can count on the light changing every single moment.
So, I took everyone into Gauger’s
studio and set up a simple group of the younger three, the younger girl
seated lowest, the middle girl seated to one side, and her brother standing
to her left to complete the inverted triangle (Photo 6).
This was my regular portrait
lighting that I’ve been showing for ages. One main light, a hairlight,
a background light, and a fill light. Again, how easy can it be?
When Time Is Short
Understandably, we had several bride and groom models for our Whitewater
Portrait/Wedding class. With our first model I went through a complete
bridal sitting myself, and then let the class experience setting up the
same series of pictures themselves. I am still using only two poses--the
feminine pose and the basic pose. For slim women the feminine pose is
my first choice, of course. I explained to the photographers that if you’re
only going to have time for a few bridal portraits on the day of the wedding,
at least make sure that they are done well.
|
|
One of my best-selling pictures
of a bride is when her body is turned away from the light, but her head
is turned and tipped back to her higher shoulder (and the light, of course).
There is a little more room in the composition on the side toward which
she is facing. The shoulders are turned almost directly toward the lens
for this 2/3 view of her face, 3/4 length composition. The picture is
cropped below her knees (Photo 7).
The bouquet is pulled back
and lowered to show her slim waistline. The bottom of her gown and her
veil are pulled out to give a nice base to the composition. I told the
people holding the veil to hold it only on the edges, allowing the folds
to show off the veil better.
Her eyes are centered in her
eye sockets, as seen through the lens of the camera--not as seen from
standing in front of the bride.
|
|
A Different Viewpoint
This is a variation of the 3/4 length seated bride.
There are a few things to the
posing of this picture that you may not first realize. The bride’s body,
of course, is at a 45° angle to the camera. Now, you know where the light
is, don’t you? It is not at a 45° angle to the camera. Nor is it directly
in front of her face. If it were there, the face would be flatly lit.
It is in the same location that you would place it if you were facing
directly into the bride’s face and photographing her full face. So, a
simple suggestion is that you stand in front of her face and set up as
if you were taking a full face picture. Then, when you come back to camera
position, you will have perfect profile lighting.
Let’s now study in detail the
placement of the profile light:
Remember, the light is only 3-4’ away from the bride. If I were to position
it farther away, I wouldn’t be able to achieve the crisp lighting that
is typical of my studio portraits.
|
|
The light in the softbox is
pointed almost directly at the bride from a height that is slightly higher
than her eyes. The exact height is dependent upon how deeply her eyes
are set. You want to make sure that the light gets into her eyes. (Don’t
forget, you can get light into her eyes by either lowering the light or
raising her head.) Look for the shadow on the inside bridge of her nose
to make sure that the light is properly placed. With the light in that
position you will not get any of the main light on the area of her left
ear. The eye should be centered in the eye as seen through the lens. In
actuality, she probably will be looking slightly out of the left side
of her eye.
Angle the main light only slightly
toward the near side of her face so that some part of that light will
hit the reflector. The reflector must be positioned to block the light
from flaring into the lens. Stand at the camera (the camera on a Benbo
tripod) and look to see if you can see any of the main light. If you can,
the lens will also see it. So, have an assistant move the reflector to
completely block the light from your view.
The fill light should be slightly
on the same side of the camera from which the main light is coming. That
will prevent any shadows that may come from the fill light from going
in the opposite direction from the main light’s shadows. All the lighting
should appear to be coming from one direction--including the light on
the background. Thus, you see the background is slightly brighter in the
direction she is facing.
|
|
Notice the cropping. Her profile
is near the center of the portrait, rather than being at the left edge
of the picture. I don’t want to put the outline of her face at the far
edge of the portrait. I always allow space in the direction that the subject
is looking. The picture is cropped on the bottom below her knees, giving
ample base upon which to support her body.
Now, take another look again
at the pose itself. We’re going to maintain everything that we’ve been
studying and practicing up until now. She’s looking to her right, so she’s
leaning to her left. For a feminine pose, you always lean her body in
the opposite direction from the way she’s facing. The posing table is
always under the low shoulder. I’ve used her train to cover the table,
showing off more of the detail than one would expect to see in a seated
portrait like this.
In addition, she’s leaning
over her waistline toward the camera. I have found that the easiest way
to set this up is to take her head in both of your hands, lift her to
her fullest height, lean her slightly to her left and bring her head a
little forward toward the lens. You can accomplish all of this in one
simple, firm adjustment.
|
|
Notice, too, that you see the
flowers from camera position. If she were to look down at her bouquet,
she would probably be looking at the back of the bouquet. That doesn’t
matter. The only thing that does matter is that the viewer of the picture
sees the flowers. You’re looking at the side of the hand, fingers flowing
gently in a downward direction when her hands are at her waistline or
below. Look at the entire portrait and study how I’ve formed a strong
base with a pyramid composition. Also, notice how a slightly lower camera
height has produced a separation between her chin and her shoulder. Be
careful to clear the back side of her profile so that no hair or veil
comes down on the far side of her face to interrupt the simple, clean
line of her profile.
The Bride And Groom Together
Now, look at this 3/4 length portrait of the bride and groom together.
Just imagine if you were looking at the bride from a 90° angle to her
left. You would be seeing exactly what we saw in the previous picture
of her profile. The lighting and her body are exactly as they were in
the previous picture.
That’s why I said that if
you feel intimidated while setting up a profile, just come around to the
front of her and set up a full face portrait. Then, when you step around
to the side, the profile is there. When the two of them are facing each
other, the posing stools are brought far enough apart to let them both lean
forward toward each other. To fill in the space between them, bring her
inside hand over to rest on his hand. His left leg is elevated slightly
by placing something on the floor in front of him and having him place his
foot on it.
|
|
Look at the positioning of
their heads in Photo 9. She’s in a feminine pose. He’s in a basic pose.
Together, their heads are parallel and face the main light at the same
angle. Thus, the light patterns are identical on both of their faces.
She’s holding the bouquet down
below her waist and slightly to the side, showing off her slim body. If
she’s heavier, then of course you can bring the bouquet up higher to cover
what needs to be hidden.
Use Soft Focus Only With
Crisp Lighting
Let’s now look at these next two images. The only difference between them
is the degree of soft focus.
On the left you see a portrait
made with a Tiffen No. 1 SoftFX drop-in filter (Photo 10). The picture
on the right (Photo 11) was made using a Tiffen No. 3 SoftFX filter. All
of my portraits are created with at least a No. 1 softening filter. The
reason that I can get by with a No. 3--all the way up to a No. 5 (made
by combining a No. 2 and a No. 3 filter)--is that I work with my main
light going directly through the softbox and that I keep my light fairly
close to my subjects. If I were to move the light farther away, or if
there were more than a single layer of fabric in front of my light, the
light would be much softer. By adding soft focus to the picture it would
appear to be almost out of focus. Not good! There would be too many complaints.
|
|
For the pictures with her hands
up to her face I placed a posing table in front of her. I raised it up
to a height that would permit her hands to reach comfortably up to her
face without her having to bend over to bring her hands up to her face.
Upright posture is a must.
If she’s turning and tipping
her head to her left shoulder, I’ll bring her hands up to the left side
of her face. Study the way her hands are positioned. Her wrists are bent
inward. You see the sides of her hands, not the backs. Her right hand
is resting on the edge of her left hand. She is not holding her wrist.
Some people might pose this way when they are just beginning.
Which do you like better: the
sharper image or the softer one? It doesn’t really matter. This is usually
a choice that I show the bride. She may sometimes think that she doesn’t
like soft focus, but when she sees the comparison side by side it’s possible
that she may change her opinion. Neither one is right nor wrong. It’s
strictly a matter of taste.
|
|
A Portrait Series Flow
Portraits should flow, one after the other. The object is not to take
a picture and then change everything for the next shot. Instead, you need
to develop a series where one picture flows right into the next one without
having to change a lot between each image. When I plan a profile, for
instance, I have this little series in mind.
I usually begin with a front
profile of the bride (Photo 12).
With her body at a 45° angle to the camera, have her turn her face
just enough to lose the "bump" of the second eyebrow. That’s a pretty
good guideline to follow when setting up a profile. See the second eye
first. Then, turn her face until you lose the second eye and eyebrow.
That way, you’re sure to see the entire profile, rather than viewing
more of the back of her head.
I usually lower the camera
slightly for that separation between her chin and her shoulder. In this
case her gown came up above her shoulder, so it was difficult to show
the complete separation. Then, after doing a profile of the bride I turn
her around, leave the lighting exactly as it is and add the groom to the
picture (Photo 13).
|
|
There are several guidelines
I watch for when setting up this shot. To begin, I set up two posing stools,
one directly behind the other. They’re a foot or two apart from each other.
I sit the groom facing the camera and the bride facing him. They both
lean toward each other so that their faces are just about touching. I
adjust the stools to have their lips fairly close to one another. This
can be accomplished by both changing the height of the stools and by raising
and lowering both of their chins to bring his lips just behind hers.
A very important aspect of
this portrait is to keep the groom at either full face, or have his face
turned slightly toward the light. I try not to have his head turned toward
her and away from the light. That would light his ear and the side of
his face, rather than what you see here. The light on his face is from
the reflector that is off to my left and the fill light. I have removed
the hairlight from this portrait because it would create highlights on
the shadowed side of the groom’s face. It’s much simpler to do this with
just the one main light, the reflector and the fill light.
I usually tip the groom’s head
out away from the bride’s profile. This, by the way, usually results in
an inverted triangle and a sort of heart shape between their two faces.
Sometimes, when you look at the ground glass of your camera you may see
too much of the top of the bride’s head, or it may appear as if she’s
tipping her head too much toward the background. You have to look carefully
and tell her to possibly tip her head slightly toward the background or
toward the camera. That way, you see the side of her face without any
distortion.
|
|
It’s just a matter of seconds
to change that picture to the next one. There is absolutely no change
in the lighting in the next portrait. All you need to do is to have the
groom open up his shoulder slightly and turn his head to profile. The
lights are already set. I usually focus right in between the two of them.
With my lens set at f/16, both profiles are sharp (Photo 14).
What I look for in this portrait
is to keep their heads fairly close together and to try to get their noses
parallel to one another. For some reason or other this usually results
in a very pleasing double profile. What a simple change from the previous
picture, but what an interesting picture this can be! If someone is wearing
glasses, as the groom is wearing here, I try to raise or lower his chin
just enough to see part of the eye behind the stem of the glasses.
Profiles Lit In Opposite
Directions
Once one of my main lights is set for a profile, why not bring the hairlight
around and light a second profile from the other side? With people facing
each other it’s very effective and easy to light each of their profiles.
You see this on television and in the movies all the time. Think of some
of those classic Hollywood portraits from the 1940s. That’s what we’re
doing here. Each of the lights creates a great hairlight on one person
and simultaneously lights the profile of the second person. Make certain
that the lens is protected from the flare of both of the lights. I use
two Westcott Monte Illuminators, one on each side of the couple to keep
the lights from my lens.
|
|
The final touches are simple.
Bring his back arm around to the bride to connect the two bodies. I often
like to bring his front hand to her face, as you see in Photo 15. The
final touch is simply to tilt the camera toward the groom. This raises
him in the picture and helps to create the 45° angle of this composition.
Finally, while the couple is
still facing each other, it’s so simple to turn off all the lights except
the background light. Then, I opened the f/stop of my camera 2 or 3 f/stops,
overexposing the dark background and turning it almost white. Simple.
Easy. Fast. What a picture to end a wedding album! The champagne is nothing
more than a glass of water with a drop of coffee, coke, or whatever is
available. The light bounces off the background and comes back through
the transparent glass. Did you ever think it was so easy? Have you tried
it yet? Once you do, you’ll do something similar at every wedding (Photo
16).
Working With A Full-Figured
Bride
Someone in the class asked me what I’d do with a full-figured bride. Although
we didn’t have such a model, I was able to demonstrate how easy it is
to seat someone in front of a chairback and have the chair cover most
of the body, and whatever else you want to hide. In this case I brought
her husband’s profile directly over the 2/3 view of her face (Photo 17).
|
|
The thing that I want to stress
to you in this picture is the lighting. When you’re lighting a 2/3 view
of a face and a profile at the same time, you have to compromise. This,
however, is a very beautiful compromise. What I did was to light his profile
with the main light. This created almost a split light on her face, but
I was able to bring that small patch of highlight onto her left cheek.
This lighting is commonly referred to as Rembrandt lighting. The reflector
and fill light, both coming from camera left, opened up the left side
of her face perfectly. I love the mood in both of their expressions, don’t
you? Can’t you also see how flattering this could be for full-figured
people?
Window Light Photography,
Updated!
Later in the week I had a woman to photograph who was "approaching middle
age." (Wonderful, how time changes our points of view, isn’t it?) This
portrait of her was created by window light. Pretty remarkable, I thought.
But it was very simple to accomplish.
First, let’s look at what she’s
wearing in Photo 18. It was perfect! Green, long sleeved V-neck, close
to her neck--everything flattering. Absolutely no distractions. How could
you want to distract from that lovely face?
|
|
I used the window light to
split light her face. Then, I added West-cott’s Monte Illuminator (silver/black
reflector) camera right--on the same side as the direction of light. The
reflector was pointed toward the window to pick up the daylight. Then,
I angled it slowly back toward her face until it picked up the window
light and bounced it back onto the shadowed side of her face. In essence
the reflector became my main light. It was the same as using twin mains.
Shortly afterward, we went
outside on Gauger’s patio for our daily buffet lunch. I noticed the light
on our model mom’s face. It was perfect profile lighting. Where did it
come from out in the middle of nowhere? She was sitting under an umbrella
that covered most of the table. Behind her the sun was hitting the side
of the house. "It don’t get no better than this!" I pointed this out to
everyone.
All I had to do was to break
out my 350mm lens on my Hasselblad for this picture. The background is
the side of the house. When you do a close-up with a telephoto lens the
background just about disappears, as you can see in Photo 19.
|
|
I kept her shoulders at a 45°
angle to the camera, looked through the lens of my camera and stole this
perfect profile of her. With her blonde hair and fair complexion this
high key portrait of her was perfect!
That was, until she turned
her face to look at me. Wow! All natural light! Highlights coming from
behind on both sides of her. "Now!" I told everyone. "It really don’t
get no better than this!" No reflectors. Nothing! Just looking and seeing
great light, great expression, and a great lady (Photo 20). After that
portrait everyone in the class began looking around and truly discovering
great light on faces all over the place. Each time they found great portrait
lighting I made them look around to see where it was coming from so that
they would be able to look for similar conditions again in the future.
(A lot of the great directional
lighting was coming through open branches of the surrounding trees.) That’s
how I learned to see light and its sources…virtually controlling light
in its raw form. What fun!
|
|
Pictorials With Children
Are Timeless!
I never know what or whom to expect next when I’m getting models coming
in from every direction. Gauger is not only a wonderful photographer/teacher/hostess
and person, she’s also a magician when it comes to finding people for
me to photograph.
A mother with her two children
were next. I remembered them from last year and what a problem I had with
the little girl. This year the kids were all prepped and they were looking
forward to the portrait session--more than I was. (Just kidding!)
I took some pictures of the
two of them together and individually. They were cooperative, but quite
"squirmy" at the same time. The photographers in class loved seeing me
work to contain the children within the frame of my viewfinder. Finally,
I gave up and invited the mother to participate. I figured that in this
way we could get some interesting pictures that they would treasure for
a lifetime. I was right.
|
|
In Photo 21 the book was the
anchor.
Yes, I was aware of facial angles, even in these circumstances. Simple.
Easy (?) and fun, for sure. The picture carries more impact, in my opinion,
than just another picture of the little boy looking at the camera and
smiling.
Then, of course, Photo 22 was
sort of setup. I love to get people playing to each other. Rubbing noses
is always a fun thing to go for. I certainly caught a special moment in
time here, don’t you think?
By bringing the main light
close to the axis of the lens I can get two faces going in opposite directions,
as I did here. You’ve got to admit that this image will remain special
for the two of them for a long time. Talk about bringing happiness to
everyone…this is one of those images that we’ll all treasure for a lifetime.
|
|
Pictorials Yes, But The
People Remain The Focus
This next couple got married on horseback so I tried several ways to photograph
them with a horse. Ever try to get a horse’s ears to stand up and forward?
Well, I’ve got to tell you, you can work all day and sometimes get lucky--and
sometimes not. We all tried everything that usually works, but of course
the horse just wasn’t cooperating.
Then I got the idea of just
letting the horse remain in the background and photographing the bride
and groom in the foreground. Gauger threw some food on the ground. The
horse remained anchored there--just where I wanted it. I then posed the
couple in the shade a little bit from the horse. I then had two alternatives.
I could have exposed for the couple in the shade and let the background
go light and overexposed. But the horse was an integral part of the picture.
Since the horse was definitely
a second focal point of the portrait I wanted good detail in the sunny
background. So I exposed for the sunshine, 1/125 at f/16, and used a single
Quantum flash to bring the light on the subjects up to f/16. That brought
the foreground and the background together and made the entire scene print
perfectly with even exposure throughout.
|
|
One important thing that I
want to point out is the way the bride is seated. Most photographers,
when posing a woman seated like this, allow her to lean sideways and rest
her weight on her left arm. Instead of doing that I set her up and leaned
her forward (over her waistline) the same way I would do for any and all
other portraits.
Notice how she’s leaning forward,
toward her knees, and compare how good she looks to how it would appear
if she were leaning away from her husband. He, of course, is kneeling
beside her to keep his head above hers. I never seat two people on the
ground for a picture. One of the people is always higher than the other.
This may not have come to your attention had I not stressed that fact
here. The next time you pose a couple similarly, watch out for this! And
try to stay away from horses, too. Just kidding. Actually, I loved the
shoot, the challenge and Photo 23.
Immediately after the previous
picture I took a look at this location for the next portrait. I have a
few places picked at Gauger’s "estate" that I know will always net us
great pictures. The light wasn’t right yet, however. You need to have
late afternoon sun to backlight the people here. Either that, or a flash
to backlight them. I just opted to come back later in the day. It was
worth it.
|
|
This picture was made as the
sun was sinking slowly in the west. The exposure was made from a bank
on the opposite side of this little inlet. I used my 350mm lens on automatic
exposure mode to pick up this image. I was really impressed, to say the
least. My Hasselblad actually reads the exposure right on the plane of
the film. It don’t get no better than that!
You can see in Photo 24 why
we needed that backlight, can’t you? Notice, too, how I’ve turned her
body to a 45° angle to support her profile. It’s made with all natural
light used to its best advantage. Notice, too, the way I’ve placed them
off-center composition with the backlit trees on the right were all planned.
I don’t really think about the rules of composition when I’m doing things
like this. After all these years, some things come naturally.
After that first exposure Gauger
picked a tree branch and held it up in front of my lens for Photo 26.
Do you like it better with
or without the extra tree branch? Most of the people who saw both Polaroids
were equally divided between the two. Personally, I like it better without
the extra tree branch. I think that it detracts from the bride and groom.
Chocolate or vanilla? All a matter of taste. Oh, yes, did I forget to
tell you? I did use a filter to change the color of the sky. It’s a Tiffen
light blue filter just held in front of my 40mm lens. Really does the
trick, doesn’t it? You can actually use just about any colored filter
to enhance the color of the sky. I like this one in particular because
it looks so natural.
Finally, here’s the "crew"
in Photo 27. These are the people who participated in the first Whitewater
Experience in the new millennium! Will you be with us for the second?
Or, maybe, you can’t wait? Join me soon in one of my other classes. Or,
you can always study lots more in my web site: www.zuga.net.
A Must-Do!
One of the most difficult things to convince most photographers is that
they can’t hold a camera in their hands while they’re posing someone.
It should always be on a tripod. That frees you to rough in the basics
of the pose with both of your hands while leaving the camera in position.
Then, you can come back to the camera, look through the lens at the ground
glass and finalize the positioning of your subject and know exactly what
the camera is seeing. Otherwise, you’re spinning your wheels. What you
see and do close-up to the subject in no way resembles what you’re going
to get in your camera.
A Word About My Equipment
For those who don’t know, all my portrait lights are Photogenic. I use
four lights out of the PhotoMaster 800w power pack. I don’t need a lot
of light, but I use the 800w system, because I often use two of the lights
to open up the reception hall background. So, my portrait lights actually
work for me throughout the wedding day.
Another reason I like the Photogenic
system is that the flash heads are small, practically weightless, and
fit easily into the small softboxes that I like to use. I work with my
two main lights only 3-4’ from my subjects. By mounting the lights on
Westcott boom arm stands I can place them anywhere I need them to be without
having to worry that the stand will get into the pictures. I don’t know
how I ever worked without them.
I direct my lights straight
through the softbox rather than bouncing them into the softbox. Using
a direct light (surrounded by a round silver reflector) through a small
softbox, I get a crisp light that falls off gradually toward the bottom
of my subjects. As a result I don’t need any vignetters to darken the
bottom of my portraits. The falloff of light toward the bottom darkens
the image gradually. It’s a natural "burning-in" of the edges. In addition,
I get round catchlights, which I prefer much more than square ones that
would ordinarily form from a square softboxes.
I keep duplicate lights on
each side of my subjects. Thus, I never have to move the light from one
side to the other. No matter in which direction I choose to face my subject,
a main light is already in place. After I decide which will be my main
light, the other one becomes the hairlight.
The two lights behind my subjects
are 1/3 the power of my main lights. They’re used to light the background
and the bride’s veil. Because they’re used much closer to the veil and
the background than my main lights, they have to be weaker to maintain
the same exposure throughout the picture. At the distance that I use my
lights from my subjects I get a reading of f/16. That’s the aperture I
set on my lens. The background light usually reads f/11 on my background,
so the background appears slightly darker than it is actually painted.
My newest background is from
Denny Mfg. Co. I have named it Zuga Green. I worked with Denny to develop
this as a takeoff on what I have been using up until now. It has no hot
spot in the center. Because of that I can light the background to be a
little bit brighter on whichever side I wish. This eliminates having to
move the background one way or another to achieve the lighter area in
front of the highlighted side of my subjects.
The reason I use a predominantly
green background is because green is the complimentary color to red. Thus,
flesh tones are rendered most favorably, regardless of the complexion
or skin coloration of my subjects. A warm-toned background, on the other
hand, would compete for attention with the face and distract from my main
subjects. I much prefer painted backgrounds to muslins, because I feel
that most of the muslins I’ve seen have folds and wrinkles that attract
attention to the backgrounds themselves. If the background is noticeable
in the portrait it is probably not right for most purposes. The background
should be quiet there, doing nothing but creating a feeling of depth to
the picture.
Occasionally, I will use a
background that is more scenic, but that is in rare and special instances.
It can be very nice when used sporadically.
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|