Site Links
|
 |
 |
 |
Scenes Within Scenes Taking A Longer Look With Telephoto Lenses
By Dave Howard June, 2000
| |
And a vertical composition at 250mm provides variety.
Photos © Dave Howard, 2000
|
|
Most of us have, on more
occasions than we’d care to count, suffered through “presentations”
of vacation photos. Whether fresh out of stacks of processing envelopes,
chronologically arranged in albums, or clunk-whacking their way monotonously
through a slide projector, you have to muster all your self-control
to stifle a yawn and keep smiling.
If the perpetrator of the
show is an amateur photographer, then hopefully you’ll at least
have been spared the endless shots of the spouse and kids squinting
into the sun in front of every major and minor monument encountered
en route. Even so, the overall effect is likely that of shuffling through
a pile of post cards: lots of pretty pictures with an underlying sameness.
The problem isn’t necessarily the pictures themselves, which may
actually be fairly respectable, but rather the unrelenting similarity.
Not a similarity of subject, but of approach, with the wide angle, overall,
“get-it-all-in” shot most often being the culprit.
Again, it’s not that
there’s anything wrong with broad, establishing shots; they paint
the scenic canvas that you should then pause and examine for further
pictorial possibilities. Possibilities that build the visual vocabulary
used to expand on your photographic story, making it interesting for
the viewer.
Within the majority of such
compositions are other images waiting to be discovered. It may come
slowly at first, but with a little practice, spotting these sub-elements
of the wide view becomes second nature. It’s just a case of identifying
other pieces of the overall puzzle that would stand alone as compositions
in their own right, serving as accent images to the original. With the
breakneck pace of life today, taking the extra moment to look can be
the greatest initial hurdle to clear.
|
| |
This
average beach scene (50mm) harbors several more interesting
elements. |
|
Once you’ve visually
isolated your potential prey, you “bag” them with long range
zooms and longer fixed focal length telephotos. George Lepp, the well-known
nature photographer, is an accomplished proponent of this general technique,
dubbing it “optical extraction.” The basic principal, however,
goes back 50 years or so to the heyday of the twin-lens Rollei-flex. Not
having interchangeable lenses, Rollei was fond of promoting the advantages
of medium format by touting the ability to crop several smaller areas
of the 6x6cm negative into additional compositions. Today’s potent
zooms let you do the same thing, but without whittling down the film area.
Focal lengths between approximately
100mm and 400mm are most useful; longer lenses tend to yield images too
abstracted to bear much relevance to the establishing shot, besides being
too cumbersome to drag along on the average vacation. The growing number
of compact, long range zooms such as 28-200mm and 28-300mm make great
travel lenses, offering great reach with minimal weight and bulk. Indeed,
such zooms are really your only option to practice this technique when
faced with the time and mobility restraints of guided tours.
|
| |
A
400mm lens reveals this cormorant drying his plumage, and
compresses the distant headland. |
|
Before you try your
hand at this method of seeing, you’ll want to polish your long lens
skills. With 300-400mm focal lengths, the tiniest vibration will be greatly
magnified, reducing the sharpest tele to fuzzy mush. A lightweight tripod
that is adequate at 100mm will likely prove worthless with longer lenses.
If your camera has a mirror lockup feature, use it. A cable release is
a must; you simply can’t avoid camera shake when releasing via the
camera’s shutter button, or for that matter with too short of a
cable release. The flimsy-wired electric releases for modern electronic
cameras are superior for vibration avoidance. If a sufficiently sturdy
tripod is too bulky and heavy for vacation duty, then use a monopod in
conjunction with faster films, which permit higher shutter speeds. The
often suggested “field fixes” of weighting the tripod or lens,
though not totally without merit, seldom improve the involved mechanics
significantly enough to overcome the basic problem, lack of structurally
effective mass. The accessory adjustable arms (Bogen, Kirk) that clamp
to a tripod leg and extend to support the front end of a telephoto lens
are more effective, but too time consuming to use on tours (unless the
tour is specifically tailored to the needs of photographers), or with
a time-unsympathetic spouse and kids in tow.
This “scenes within scenes”
scenario is not meant to replace a thorough physical exploration of a
location. If you have the time and the opportunity, walking around and
checking out your subject from all angles will produce the greatest variety
of shots. However, when you’re pressed for time, or when physical
barriers prevent a closer approach, a sharp eye and a long focal length
can provide visual diversity without moving more than a step or two from
your original shooting position. In addition, the compressed telephoto
renditions provide a pleasing variety of perspective that adds significantly
to the visual rhythm and pacing of a presentation.
|
| |
While
this mini-seascape comes into view at 250mm. |
|
Another mental hurdle
for many amateurs exploring this technique for the first time is getting
over the idea that the “extracted” shots have to have the
same impact as the wide shot. In some instances they may well have, perhaps
even more so, but on average they’ll be of a visually “quieter”
nature, serving in a supporting role. This variation in visual intensity
goes a long way toward building a presentation with a coherent flow, elevating
it from mere collections of images.
The illustrations accompanying
this article were purposely shot as you would while on vacation--with
whatever weather and lighting conditions that Mother Nature happened to
be doling out at any given moment. The locations are close enough for
me to have returned as often as needed to obtain perfect light direction,
idyllic clouds, the full foliage of spring or summer, etc., but that would
run contrary to the intended object lesson. The Object of this exercise
is not to produce studied “perfection,” but to be able to
capture the greatest degree of variety possible in the least amount of
time. To this end you also have to learn to quell the urge to run around
looking for a slightly better vantage point for the secondary shots in
each series. The time you waste wandering around will cost you in lost
picture opportunities; just about the time you finally settle on a shooting
position, the tour guide will start herding you along to the next stop,
the light will disappear, a garbage truck will pull into your field of
view and park, or wildlife will take flight. Learn to spot relevant elements
quickly, and get them on film expeditiously. If your camera has the feature,
auto-bracketing can increase your batting average when shooting under
tricky lighting conditions on the fly. None of the auxiliary images shown
here required more than three steps from the original shooting position.
Before closing, I’d like
to offer some practical advice regarding lens selection. First, when traveling,
bulk and weight are critical. Careful equipment selection will result
in an enjoyable vacation and photo outing; done wrong, it can be the trip
to hell and back. Choose slower, lighter, compact lenses, combined with
faster films, rather than fast, bulky, heavy lenses and slower films.
I would rather have a sharp image with slightly visible but tight grain
structure, as opposed to a blurred, grainless one. Second, choose a wide
range zoom that goes from wide to long tele, such as the 28-200mm and
28-300mm models previously mentioned. If you try using a pair of zooms,
such as a 28-70mm and a 70-210mm, you’ll find that you’re
constantly switching from the former for the establishing shot, to the
latter for the additional series shots. This wastes time and grows old
fast. To extend your range of focal lengths further, add one super-wide
lens, such as a 20mm, along with a compact 300mm or 400mm f/5.6 tele;
faster teles are too big and too heavy for casual travel duty, not to
mention having gargantuan filter requirements. Also, I prefer to carry
the fixed focal length long tele, rather than tack a tele-extender onto
an already slow zoom; adding a 2x extender to a f/5.6 zoom (at longest
position) results in an f/11 lens, wide open--ISO 1600 anyone?
Give this technique a try;
I think you’ll like what it can do for your travelogs, especially
slide shows. And you’re not the only one who’ll appreciate
the difference; the odds are better than ever that you’ll no longer
have to resort to subterfuge to lure your unsuspecting friends within
range of your vacation photos.
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|