Site Links
|
 |
 |
 |
Great Outdoors (Upside) Down Under
By Theo Allofs May, 2000
Great Outdoors
| |
This
gray-headed flying fox became a favorite of mine. I
called him Karl-Heinz, and he always hung in the same
spot, day after day. He seemed to get quite used to
seeing my lens pointing at him. For this photo I used
TTL fill flash with minus 11/3 compensation.
Photos © Theo Allofs, 2000
|
|
I had already spent quite
a bit of time photographing the fruit bats of Australia for a magazine
assignment when I was approached to contribute to Daybreak 2000, a coffee-table
book in which 120 photographers from all over the globe would document
the state of the natural world on January 1, 2000. Since I knew I would
be in Australia that day, the fruit bats, which are commonly called
“flying foxes,” became my Daybreak 2000 project.
Flying foxes, which some scientists consider closely related to primates
because of their appearance and behavior, used to live on nectar and
petals of eucalyptus blossoms and flowers of other native plants as
well as on wild forest fruit. Their main problem today, however, and
one of the reasons why I have been documenting them, is the loss of
much of their forest habitat due to clear-cutting. For this reason many
colonies have been newly established close to cities, where the bats
tend to feed in fruit orchards if not enough eucalyptus flowers and
other traditional food sources are available to them. One of the colonies,
or “camps,” that I photographed is located near Brisbane
and was established about 20 years ago. Currently several hundred thousand
flying foxes are living in this camp.
At first glance, flying foxes seem to be subjects that are relatively
easy to photograph, and in one way they are. Apart from their nightly
feeding forays, they share one main occupation during the day: they
hang in trees, as you can see in my pictures. So just taking images
of the bats is not too difficult; getting good photographs, however,
is a different matter altogether.
In order to achieve this goal, I first had to build a “hide”
in their camp to get to eye level with them. With the permission of
the land owner on whose property part of the colony was located, I constructed
a platform supported by a 16 foot scaffold that leaned against one of
the roosting trees. To avoid disturbing the bats, I set the scaffold
in place over two consecutive nights while the flying foxes were away
on their fly-outs. Over the platform I rigged a green tarp that hung
down in front, concealing me from them, with holes cut in it for my
lens and flash. Then, for about four weeks, I would get into position
in the pitch dark of predawn and await their return.
|
| |
|
sGray-headed and black flying foxes, with one caught in
mid-yawn. I exposed for the sky with center-weighted metering
and used the flash on manual, set for maximum output. The
aperture determined the proper exposure of the flying foxes,
while the combination of aperture and shutter speed was
responsible for the right exposure of the background.
|
|
My daily routine during this
time consisted of shooting from around four in the morning until about
10 o’clock, when the light became too harsh. Then I climbed down
from the hide for a few hours’ rest. In early afternoon I returned
to the hide to observe and photograph until dusk. Initially a few of the
flying foxes were disturbed by my movements up and down the ladder, but
they quickly settled back into their trees, realizing that I meant no
harm.
Even with the tarp in place,
they were aware of my presence, but as time went by they became increasingly
used to me. In fact, the tarp was quite useless for concealment--but not
for protection. Remember that hundreds of the flying foxes hung above
me in the tree and…well, you get the idea. The tarp protected me
very well, but the front end of my lens was a different story; it needed
constant cleaning.
Flying foxes are very territorial.
In the mornings when they returned, they often fought briefly over roosting
sites. When another flying fox landed too close, there would be a quick
skirmish and usually the intruder went away. Sometimes “away”
meant just a foot or so on the branch. When I refer to “roosting
site” I mean not only the tree, and not only a specific branch,
but a specific part of a specific branch. Generally, though, the flying
foxes are very friendly toward each other, and there is little aggression.
When they roost, they do not
keep their eyes closed for hours at a time. They wake up, look around,
see what is going on--especially when a bird of prey circles above--and
then go back to sleep when the danger is gone. Due to the long hours I
spent in the hide, I was able to photograph them during those moments
of alertness.
|
| |
|
Red flying foxes in a tightly clustered roosting group,
a typical behavior for this species. They were only about
20’ away from me and followed the movement of the
big lens with curious eyes. Although they were lit by the
first rays of the morning sun, the natural light was not
sufficient to reduce the contrast between their dark shapes
and the bright blue sky, so I had to use fill flash.
|
|
The amount of equipment I required
forced me to make two trips up the ladder each time to bring my 60 lb
backpack, camera case, and tripod to the platform. Most of the pictures,
however, were taken with just one lens--a 600mm f/4 Nikkor AF-S. The flying
foxes were as close as 20’, sometimes less, but for format-filling
portraits I still needed the 600, often with a 1.4 tele-converter. I used
both an F5 and F100, and my film was Provia 100 F, which is the best film
I’ve ever used for wildlife photography because of its extremely
fine grain even when pushed one stop. My tripod is a Gitzo Mountaineer
with an Arca Swiss ball head.
One of the reasons photographing
flying foxes is a challenge lies in the difficulty with lighting. Since
flying foxes are very dark and the sur-rounding area usually several stops
brighter, it’s a real problem to get good exposures. Although I
generally prefer only natural light in my photography, the key piece of
my equipment during the flying fox shoot was an SB-26 Speedlight, which
I often used for fill flash. If my subjects were too far away for the
flash, even at full output, I used a Kirk Flash X-Tender, basically a
Fresnel-lens magnifier that increases the flash unit’s range. The
general light conditions determined my flash output setting. On an overcast
day, with soft ambient light, TTL flash metering with a compensation of
minus 11/3 stops produced the best results. When I photo-graphed the flying
foxes against a bright background, I had to use plus compensation. In
any case, I made sure to bracket the flash unit’s light output,
as it’s pretty much impossible to predict the perfect balance between
ambient light and fill flash. Experience is good, but control is better!
Never trust your experience alone, and always control the situation by
eliminating errors. In this case, control was achieved with bracketing.
Theo Allofs is a widely published
wildlife and nature photographer. He has three coffee-table books to his
credit in addition to numerous images featured in “International
Wildlife,” “American Photo,” “Outside,”
and “BBC Wildlife Magazine,” among other publications. His
international awards include two top prizes in the prestigious BG Wildlife
Photographer of the Year Competition. “Daybreak 2000,” published
by Northword Press, is available now. Readers can see more of Allofs’
work on his web site at: www.naturbilder.de/allofsenglish.
Beginning with this issue, Great Outdoors will appear on a bimonthly schedule
in the magazine.
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|