|
Recent Additions
Cameras
Other Digital Darkroom Portraiture Sports/Action Lighting Outdoor/Travel Wildlife Film & Processing Photo Allies Blog Co-Op Forums Galleries Photo News Past eNewsletters David B. Brooks Jon Sienkiewicz Turn Your Hobby Into Cash Industry Voice Glossary Trade Shows Workshops Photo Links Shutterbug Radio Manufacturers Contact Us Outdoor Tips Travel Tips Portrait Tips Sports Tips Lens Tips Software Tips Family Tips Instant Links Editor's Notes Talking Pictures Picture This! Features Book Reviews Student Union Point of View Web Profiles Exhibits Photo Clubs News & Notes Help Digital Help Business Trends Digital Innovations Globetrotter Master Class Passport The Darkroom Dealer Locator Catalog Showcase Shutterbug Shopper Photo Lab Showcase Service Directory Classifieds Photography Lighting Digital Photography Equipment Film Processing Lexar Media Camera Lenses |
Genuine Fractals 4.1; Resampling With GF Might Make The Megapixel Race Moot
I have a bunch of prints on the walls and desktops of my studio, and I almost can’t believe my eyes. For years I have been stubbornly teaching that image resolution (in pixel dimensions) and physical print size were in lock step, and even scoffed at a camera maker for claiming that their 5-megapixel digicam could produce 20x24 prints. Make a good 13x19 from anything less than a 10-megapixel camera? Couldn’t be done. Make a 20x24 print from anything less than a high-res scan or 16-megapixel digital SLR with some resampling thrown in for good measure? Don’t be silly. I had been solidly behind the max +30 percent rule for resampling, and if I ventured beyond that I would resample in 10 percent steps, not all at once.
The release of Genuine Fractals 4.1 caused me to revisit this thinking and
to run a series of tests with various image files. Before I get to the tests
and conclusions, a short summary of the interplay between pixels, resolution,
and physical print size might be in order. File size can only be changed by
playing with the pixel dimensions. Output, or the physical print size, depends
on the pixel dimensions (file size) modified by the resolution. All these work
in lock step, so when you change or resample any of them another will be affected.
This is seen by opening the Image Size box within Adobe’s Photoshop and
playing with the numbers.
I had dabbled with Genuine Fractals in the past but thought that the fact
that you could only save files as .stn format (actually short for STiNG) limited
its usefulness and posed another format that I did not need or want. I heard
from many photographers that it worked very well, but it seemed sort of esoteric.
I then thought they had faded away. I was wrong, as the company had gone through
some “iterations,” as they say in the trade, and now was back with
a clever approach to the application of their technology.
Genuine Fractals’ folks claim that their “sweet spot” for
resampling is between 500-600 percent. They also claim that you can go as high
as 800 percent by using a combination of their program and Photoshop’s
Resize dialog box, starting at 400 percent in Genuine Fractals and doing 200
percent more in Photoshop’s Resize.
Article Continues: Page 2 »
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||





