Canon’s PIXMA Pro9500; How Does Canon’s New Consumer Pigment Ink Photo Printer Perform?
David B. Brooks, November, 2007
It has been well over a year since Canon announced the Canon PIXMA Pro9500.
In fact, I was so impatient that I requested the opportunity to try out the
professional Canon imagePROGRAF iPF5000 17” 12-color ink model (report
published in the March 2007 issue of Shutterbug, and now online at www.shutterbug.com).
So now the question is: does the consumer-oriented 13” Canon PIXMA Pro9500
pigment ink photo printer match up to the expectations set by the larger professional
model? Why compare the two? Both the professional wide-format Canon imagePROGRAF
iPF5000 and the PIXMA Pro9500 use Canon Lucia inks and the printers seem to
have few other apparent similarities; inside there is some shared technology
as well.
|
Canon’s
long awaited PIXMA Pro9500 10-color pigment ink printer. |
|
As for differences, there is only a 4” difference in maximum print width,
but the PIXMA is just a third the weight and overall size of the iPF5000, although
a bit larger than its competitors. The Pro9500 also shares more in styling with
the PIXMA Pro9000 than the iPF5000. The biggest difference is that the PIXMA
Pro9500 uses 10 colors of ink and one replaceable print head while the iPF5000
uses 12 colors of ink and two interchangeable print heads. The 12 inks of the
iPF5000 include a photo and matte gray as well as a blue, while the PIXMA Pro9500
does not use blue and only has one gray ink.
Inkjet Tech
It has been well over a decade since I first started printing color with inkjets,
and have tested a number of new generations of photo printers. The improvement
over the years has been dramatic. The improvement has come from the leading
manufacturers via radical developments in ink technology combined with the refinement
of the delivery system. The earliest printers had a four-ink, traditional CMYK
color palette. Today the color strategy employs many more colors, with some
printers like the Canon PIXMA and imagePROGRAF models offering 10 or 12 inks,
often including two shades of magenta and cyan and a primary red, green, and
blue, backed up with gray ink in addition to black. The logic of these large
ink palettes is that color can be reproduced more accurately and vividly with
less mixing of different colored ink. That makes ultimate sense, and the print
results indicate it works incredibly well.
|
For
all too many years I have had the impression that most hardware
manufacturers’ software support was a poor stepchild and afterthought
accompanying the product. Canon seems to have put real talent and
effort into their free, downloadable Digital Photo Professional
raw converter and photo editor, and now, with the PIXMA Pro9500,
a plug-in for easy and effective printing accessible within Adobe’s
Photoshop CS, CS2, and CS3. |
|
The delivery system of the PIXMA Pro9500 includes a print head with 768 nozzles
for each of the 10 colors (matte black, photo black, gray, cyan, magenta, yellow,
photo cyan, photo magenta, red, and green), making a total of 7680 nozzles print
at a maximum resolution of 4800x2400dpi with a 3 picoliter droplet size. This
color palette also supports black and white printing, easily configured to produce
a neutral tone with very little color ink used. Other specifications include
USB 2.0 and software support for both Microsoft Windows and Apple Mac computers.
|
Color
and gray, side by side with flesh tones, demands a delicate balance
and precise application of the just the right mix of inks. This
studio glamour portrait would fail miserably if any of the elements
of color were distorted, but the PIXMA Pro9500 gets it right, and
consistently for a great variety of subjects printed.
All Photos © 2007, David B. Brooks, All Rights Reserved |
|
Canon Bonuses
But there’s also some “bonus” software that is truly beneficial
with this printer—Canon’s Easy-PhotoPrint and Easy-PhotoPrint Pro
(particularly the latter) which are software “preview-type” plug-ins
for both Adobe’s Photoshop (CS3) and Canon’s Digital Photo Professional
raw converter and editor application, downloadable from the Canon website for
free. This Easy-PhotoPrint Pro and Digital Photo Professional (3.1) is unlike
most software provided by hardware manufacturers. It is truly easy to learn
and use as well as being an effective and efficient way to make very fine prints,
even directly from raw files.
Another exemplary Canon feature is the Canon paper sample pack, available on
their eStore website and specifically configured for the PIXMA Pro9500. This
Digital Art Paper Variety Pack (DAP-101) includes: five sheets each of Fine
Art Paper “Museum Etching,” “Photo Rag,” Premium Matte,
and Photo Paper Plus Semi-gloss. Two of the Canon papers are 1005 cotton rag
papers made for Canon by Hahnemühle; another is a fiber-based Canon paper;
and the fourth is a semigloss RC paper. All are what I would consider ideal
for printing with the Pro9500.
|
Flowers
shot with a high-megapixel D-SLR in the soft light of a greenhouse
under ideal conditions can record very specific colors of extreme
intensity. The Canon PIXMA Pro9500 reproduced these bright and colorful
images quite faithfully to the subjects. |
|
Printing With The Canon PIXMA Pro9500
As usual with my printer tests I spread the images printed across a range of
subjects, from landscapes and flower close-ups to portraits. In addition to
using the Canon papers I calibrated and profiled the printer for use with three
independent papers, including Hahnemühle’s Pearl, PremierArt’s
Watercolor, and Mitsubishi’s Diamond Jet Matte, which is a smooth “photo
matte” now sold directly by Mitsubishi’s website at a very affordable
price.
All of my test printing was done as in my usual manner using an Adobe Photoshop
CS3 workflow, selecting to have Photoshop control color, or what we used to
call a Profile to Profile workflow. After making profiles for the independent
papers, and then printing my color test pattern with these new profiles as well
as the Canon papers with their supplied profiles, I found the Canon profile
to be very neutral and precisely gray balanced. However, the Canon profiles
clipped highlights slightly more than profiles I made (I prefer as much highlight
detail in prints as I can possibly reproduce). In other words, Canon opts for
maximum print brilliance at the cost of a little less detail in print highlights.
I could easily compensate for this by a minor tweak to my image file’s
highlight density before printing with the Canon papers.
|
 |
(Left):
If anything, a high-key portrait photographed against white demands
an accurate balance of inks applied to render the background with
a truly neutral gray as well as coloring the subject realistically.
(Right): Some subjects like this classic face can encompass extremes
of color, from intense red lipstick to the pale warm tint of pearls,
all contrasted by clouds and sky in the middle and behind. The Canon
PIXMA Pro9500 reproduces the bold, the middle, and the bland with
equal accuracy and appropriate intensity. |
|
From the very beginning of my tests I found out just how spoiled I had become
using the Canon imagePROGRAF iPF5000, at least in terms of print speed with
its dual print heads and 30,000 nozzles. Of course, a professional, commercially-used
printer has to be faster because in business time is money. But the PIXMA Pro9500
is really not all that slow, and is in fact quite comparable to other 13”
inkjets at maximum resolution.
|
