|
Recent Additions
Cameras
Other Digital Darkroom Portraiture Sports/Action Lighting Outdoor/Travel Wildlife Film & Processing Photo Allies Blog Co-Op Forums Galleries Photo News Past eNewsletters David B. Brooks Jon Sienkiewicz Turn Your Hobby Into Cash Industry Voice Glossary Trade Shows Workshops Photo Links Shutterbug Radio Manufacturers Contact Us Outdoor Tips Travel Tips Portrait Tips Sports Tips Lens Tips Software Tips Family Tips Editor's Notes Talking Pictures Picture This! Features Book Reviews Student Union Point of View Web Profiles Exhibits Photo Clubs News & Notes Help Digital Help Business Trends Digital Innovations Globetrotter Master Class Passport The Darkroom Catalog Showcase Shutterbug Shopper Photo Lab Showcase Service Directory Free Product Info Classifieds Photography Lighting Digital Photography Equipment Film Processing Lexar Media Camera Lenses |
Time Travel; Using Still Images To Imply Motion
Photography can do two things that no other artistic medium can do: It can freeze motion so we are able to examine every detail in a fast-moving subject, thus revealing things that our eyes could never catch; and it can blur the same subject to express the fluidity and aesthetics of motion. When you blur a subject with a long enough shutter speed, it blends the background with a unique mixture of color as if an impressionist painter interpreted the image instead of a camera. No matter how many times you try this technique the results are always a surprise. It’s impossible to predict in your mind’s eye exactly how the final image will look. That’s part of the fun.
The shutter speed that will give you the most artistic type of blur is dependent
on several factors. There are four parts of the equation that go into the thought
process in creating blurred images, and they interact with each other in ways
that make it impossible for me to give you a guarantee that any particular shutter
speed will be the right one for the effect you want to achieve.
The speed of the subject is obviously critical, but also very important is
the subject itself. For example, if you blur a
5-year-old child on a tricycle as much as an adult on a racing bike, the results
would look silly. Similarly, if you blur a jogger as much as a Formula 1 race
car it wouldn’t make sense. Artistic license can be used, of course, to
express certain concepts, which can include humor and exaggerated speed. But
keep in mind that if you want to realistically express the movement of a subject
the amount of blur you add should make visual sense.
The lens is an important factor as well for this reason: telephoto lenses
magnify movement because of their narrow angle of view. Wide angles encompass
so much in the frame that movement, even of a relatively fast-moving subject,
seems slower than it really is. A shutter speed of 1/4 sec will show significant
blur of a waterfall, for example, with a 300mm lens, but the same waterfall
taken from the same shooting position with a 16mm wide angle will barely show
blur in the water. I would use a full 1-second exposure if you want to see the
water turned into the soft, white, “cotton candy” look that is so
artistic.
Sharp Juxtaposed With Blur
Article Continues: Page 2 »
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||








