|
Recent Additions
Cameras
Other Digital Darkroom Portraiture Sports/Action Lighting Outdoor/Travel Wildlife Film & Processing Photo Allies Blog Co-Op Forums Galleries Photo News Past eNewsletters David B. Brooks Jon Sienkiewicz Turn Your Hobby Into Cash Industry Voice Glossary Trade Shows Workshops Photo Links Shutterbug Radio Manufacturers Contact Us Outdoor Tips Travel Tips Portrait Tips Sports Tips Lens Tips Software Tips Family Tips Editor's Notes Talking Pictures Picture This! Features Book Reviews Student Union Point of View Web Profiles Exhibits Photo Clubs News & Notes Help Digital Help Business Trends Digital Innovations Globetrotter Master Class Passport The Darkroom Catalog Showcase Shutterbug Shopper Photo Lab Showcase Service Directory Free Product Info Classifieds Photography Lighting Digital Photography Equipment Film Processing Lexar Media Camera Lenses |
Hahnemühle’s Photo Rag Pearl 320 gsm; A Classic Photo Look In An Inkjet Paper
The digital trend these days seems to be film and silver halide print emulation.
Not long ago we reviewed Alien Skin’s Exposure software, which had push-button
manipulation of digital images to make them look just as if they had been exposed
on certain types of film. DxO’s FilmPack, subject of a future review,
offers similar image “looks.” And at a recent photo trade show we
met with more than one paper vendor who told us that their newest paper “looked
and felt just like silver halide paper.” If everybody thinks film and
silver paper was so great, why have we gone down this digital road? That’s the aim, I believe, of the latest Photo Rag Pearl paper from
Hahnemühle, part of the FineArt Inkjet Paper line. This 320 gsm paper (quite
thick) has been described as having a “pearl” coat, although for
me it’s very much like a double-weight glossy “dried matte.”
This was a technique we used to take advantage of the double-weight (thus durable)
glossy sharpness without a ferrotyped sheen. It was achieved by running the
print through a drum dryer with the glossy face toward the cloth and not the
ferrotyping plate. It was the preferred method and surface for fine art printers
and the one I was taught, and later taught in a Masters Printing class at Parsons/New
School in New York.
As to longevity on this surface, it depends on the printer/ink combo in which
you use it. I tested it with Epson’s Stylus Pro 3800 (review available
at www.shutterbug.com) and in dark storage it is probably a 200-year print.
(If it isn’t, let me know in 2207 and I’ll refund the price of the
magazine to you.) I downloaded the ICC profile from the Hahnemühle website
and worked with a standard printer driver protocol in my MacBook Pro and Photoshop
CS3. However, I did make some prints using the Epson Advanced Black and White
setup, and was as pleased as I was with the straight paper profile. I also printed
on the Epson Luster profile and found that it worked great as well.
The weight of the paper is such that I had to do single-sheet printing in
the Epson 3800; the same would hold true for most desktop printers in the 13x19”
size, the size I tested. In addition, you might be tempted to use matte black
ink on this paper, as it has a sort of matte surface texture—don’t.
This is for photo black inks, which I found out after using matte black and
getting unacceptable bronzing on the prints. This photo black choice means that
you could use this paper on both pigment and dye inkjet printers. I did print
some color images using the paper and they were fine.
Hanhnemühle’s Photo Rag Pearl 320 gsm (heavyweight) is available in various cut sheet and roll sizes. For pricing, dealers, profiles, etc., please visit www.hahnemuhle.com. You can also write to Hahnemühle at 722 E. Calhoun St., Woodstock, IL 60098.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||


The
truth is, it wasn’t the look of film and silver paper that caused everyone
to rush toward digital…it was what you could do with digital that you
couldn’t with film. The ease of use, the lack of chemical exposure, and
the ability to nuance images on screen beyond what even the most experienced
printer could provide in the darkroom (at least technically) all made desktop
printing much more attractive than darkroom work. The look and feel of film
and silver paper was pretty darn good, in fact, and that’s why when paper
companies look at the photographic market they seem to want to do everything
they can to emulate the surface and weight of classic black and white papers.
In fact, the look they seek is often on papers that are no longer available
to silver printers—ironic, don’t you think?




